The Ho Chi Minh City People's Committee will continue to study mechanisms and policies related to compensation and land clearance, especially the method of determining land prices for calculating compensation, support, and resettlement for the project.

Ho Chi Minh City stated that, based on that, it will propose to the Central Government amendments and additions to suit the city's practical situation; at the same time, it will continue to improve the process of establishing, appraising, and approving land price adjustment coefficients for calculating compensation, support, and resettlement for projects in the city, in order to minimize the time required for this process.

At the same time, the Ho Chi Minh City People's Committee will propose to relevant ministries and agencies to allow the application of the average coefficient of the area or a percentage rate compared to the land price for projects in areas with insufficient market information; and to allow the People's Committees of districts and communes to balance the compensation price level to propose for projects in neighboring areas or with similar socio-economic conditions to the approved project (this will significantly reduce time and manpower).

In other cases, it is recommended that the People's Committee of the district/county be authorized to hire a unit with the function of appraising land prices to conduct surveys of prevailing market land prices in order to propose land price adjustment coefficients.

Furthermore, the Ho Chi Minh City People's Committee also proposed that ministries and agencies allow the implementation of a mechanism whereby the Ho Chi Minh City People's Committee 'authorizes' the district-level People's Committees to approve land price adjustment coefficients for Group C projects with a land acquisition area of ​​less than 1 hectare and fewer than 10 affected households (for projects located in adjacent areas or with similar socio-economic conditions to approved projects). This will enhance the capacity of specialized agencies, the responsibility of districts, and significantly reduce the time and proactive approach of districts in project implementation.

According to CafeF